Nov 7, 2026; Auburn, Alabama, USA; Arkansas Razorbacks running back Cam Settles (27) carries against the Auburn Tigers during the first quarter at Jordan-Hare Stadium. Mandatory Credit: John Reed-Imagn Images | Source: Lastwordonsports.com - Kate Pearson Halyburton, EditorThe Razorbacks had the lead, explosive runs, and a late answer on offense. They still could not contain Byrum Brown or finish a game they had every opportunity to win. Arkansas does not need a participation trophy for making a loss more competitive. The Razorbacks needed a victory. They built an early lead, carried an advantage into the fourth quarter, and delivered a late touchdown to tie the game. Then Auburn drove into field-goal range and won 26-23 on Alex McPherson’s 43-yard kick with 33 seconds remaining.Razorback Report Card: Auburn PostgameArkansas fell to 3-6 overall and 1-5 in SEC play. Yes, this was better than Missouri. That is a remarkably low bar for a program asking supporters to remain invested in its direction. The pregame report card established the expectations before kickoff. Contain Brown. Establish the running game. Protect possessions. Finish opportunities. Those standards do not become unreasonable because Arkansas failed to meet them.Run Defense: FThe assignment was not a secret. Keep Brown from becoming Auburn’s most dependable rushing threat. Maintain responsibilities when he leaves the pocket. Make the Tigers find another answer. The pregame benchmark required Arkansas to hold Brown below 60 rushing yards and prevent a quarterback run of 20 yards or more. He finished with 120 yards, including a 39-yard fourth-quarter run.That is not narrowly missing the target. That lets the specific problem identified before kickoff become a central reason for losing. Brown gained 125 rushing yards after halftime, overcoming his negative first-half total. His five-yard touchdown run gave Auburn its first lead. His later rushing contributions helped the Tigers produce their final touchdown and winning field-goal drive.Arkansas deserves credit for containing him early. It can’t hide behind that first half after he took control of the second. A defensive plan is not successful simply because it worked before the opponent adjusted. Responding to that adjustment is part of the job.Pass Defense: DThe passing yardage was manageable. The moments were not. Brown threw two touchdown passes after halftime and completed 10 of 14 second-half attempts. Arkansas disrupted him early, then allowed him to become more efficient when Auburn needed production most. The defining failure came on third-and-12 in the fourth quarter.Arkansas had an opportunity to sack Brown. Instead, he escaped and found Keshaun Singleton for a 28-yard touchdown that put Auburn ahead 23-16 with 3:56 remaining. Third-and-12 should favor the defense. Arkansas turned it into a scoring opportunity for the offense. Finish the sack, and the situation changes. Maintain the coverage through the scramble, and the touchdown becomes more difficult.The Razorbacks did neither. Brown later completed a 21-yard pass to Singleton during the winning possession. Auburn did not need an overwhelming passing performance. It needed timely completions against a defense that could not finish enough important downs. That was sufficient.Rushing Offense: B-MinusThe running backs gave Arkansas something useful. The offense did not maximize it. Sutton Smith broke a 65-yard run that set up Braylen Russell’s two-yard touchdown. Cam Settles added a 46-yard run during the third quarter and finished with 100 yards on 16 carries. Those were meaningful contributions while the outcome remained undecided.Arkansas officially finished with 172 rushing yards on 44 attempts, approximately 3.9 yards per carry. That cleared the 150-yard pregame target but fell narrowly below the 4.0-yard efficiency requirement. The total includes sacks, exactly as the pregame grading rules specified.Nobody can remove the damaging plays afterward just because the adjusted numbers look better. The sequence following Settles’ long run captured the broader frustration. Arkansas created an opportunity, absorbed a third-down sack, and settled for a field goal. The running backs helped put Auburn under pressure. The rest of the operation too often let it slip.Photo Credit: John Reed-Imagn ImagesPassing Offense: D-PlusOne late touchdown drive cannot serve as an alibi for the rest of the afternoon. KJ Jackson completed 14 of 30 passes, threw an interception, and finished below the pregame passing-yardage target. The requirements were at least 62% completions, 225 yards, and no interception. Arkansas did not meet them.The protection shares responsibility. Auburn recorded six sacks for 42 lost yards, including three sacks by Shadarius Toodle in his collegiate debut. Those are possessions pushed backward when the game is winnable. The passing operation includes the quarterback, protection, receivers, and the answers provided by the coaching staff. Assigning every unsuccessful snap to whichever player happens to be closest to the ball would be convenient, not complete.Arkansas did respond late. Jackson connected with Ty Lockwood for 43 yards and eventually found Antonio Jordan for a 23-yard touchdown that tied the game. That drive deserves credit. It also raises the frustrating question of why useful answers arrived so inconsistently before the situation became desperate.Discipline and Possession: D“Own the Ball” cannot keep becoming a phrase Arkansas explains after failing to do it. Jackson’s first-half interception ended an opportunity while the Razorbacks led 10-0. Auburn struggled to establish itself, and Arkansas failed to keep the pressure on. The final possession supplied another situational breakdown.With no timeouts available, Arkansas committed intentional grounding and incurred a 10-second runoff. The final lateral sequence ended with a fumble recovered by Auburn. The last fumble deserves context. A desperate lateral play is not the same as losing possession during a normal offensive sequence. The grounding penalty is harder to dismiss.Arkansas had almost no time to waste and lost some without improving its position. That is precisely when preparation should make a difficult situation more manageable. A muffed punt earlier in the fourth quarter also left Arkansas starting at its own 13, although the Razorbacks retained possession. Not every mistake became a turnover. Enough of them made the assignment harder.Finishing: FArkansas led by 10 in the second quarter. It led at halftime. It led entering the fourth. It then scored a late touchdown to tie the game but still couldn’t force Auburn to play beyond regulation. The Razorbacks had several chances. None ended with a victory.Max Gilbert made field goals from 38, 37 and 46 yards while missing attempts from 53 and 51. Those misses were difficult kicks, not automatic points that can be added to Arkansas’ total. But asking the kicker to rescue stalled possessions from long distance is not a dependable finishing strategy. Neither is turning an explosive rushing play into a field goal because the offense cannot protect the quarterback on third down.The defense received the final examination. After Arkansas tied the score, Auburn traveled 50 yards in 10 plays and positioned McPherson for the winning kick. One stop could have changed the ending. Arkansas did not produce it.Coaching and Adjustments: DRyan Silverfield’s previous 3-0 record against Alex Golesh belonged in the pregame discussion. It does not belong in the postgame discussion. Golesh’s team became more effective after halftime. Brown’s rushing production exploded, Auburn’s passing efficiency improved, and the Tigers scored 17 fourth-quarter points. Arkansas’ early success demonstrated that the preparation had value. The second half demonstrated that the preparation was not enough.Coaching includes what happens after the opponent identifies an answer. It includes helping the offense survive pressure, preserving defensive responsibilities against a scrambling quarterback, and preparing a team to handle a final possession.Players must execute. Coaches must establish an operation that produces execution more consistently than this. The responsibility is shared. It cannot keep being passed around until nobody appears to own it.The Last Grade: DArkansas was more competitive than it was against Missouri. That sentence is true. It is also insufficient. The Razorbacks received explosive rushing plays, built an early lead, and delivered a late tying touchdown. They had enough working to make this a legitimate opportunity rather than a hopeless assignment. Then came the familiar gap between knowing what was required and doing it when the result depended on it. Brown escaped. Possessions stalled.Auburn adjusted. Arkansas lost. Silverfield does not need every part of this team to become excellent immediately. He does need improvement to become something more persuasive than a smaller margin of defeat. A closer loss remains a loss. Arkansas has become too practiced at explaining the distinction and not practiced enough at changing the result.Main Photo: John Reed-Imagn ImagesRelated College Football ContentBig Plays Define Washington’s Loss to Penn StateWake Forest Hammers Merrimack, 77-0Another Beatdown Ends Ohio State’s Season
Razorback Report Card: Auburn Postgame

The Razorbacks had the lead, explosive runs, and a late answer on offense. They still could not contain Byrum Brown or finish a game they had every opportunity to win. Arkansas does not need a participation trophy for making a loss more competitive. The Razorbacks needed a victory. They built an early lead, carried an …
Key Takeaways
- Razorback Report Card: Auburn Postgame.
- The Razorbacks had the lead, explosive runs, and a late answer on offense.
- They still could not contain Byrum Brown or finish a game they had every opportunity to win.
Read Complete Original Article
Published originally on Last Word on Sports



