Tuesday, November 10, 2026||
MultiKhabarMultiKhabar

Stacey & Joe: In Too Deep review – Solomon deserves better than these dismal old misogynistic tropes

TH
The Guardian - UK
By Lucy Mangan
Share:WhatsAppFacebookX (Twitter)Telegram
Stacey & Joe: In Too Deep review – Solomon deserves better than these dismal old misogynistic tropes
Photo / Coverage: The Guardian - UKCredit: Lucy Mangan
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The presenter is an absolute powerhouse – a responsible, clever, ambitious woman without whom nothing and no one around her would survive. So why is she constantly described as bossy? Stacey Solomon is taking care of five children, 25 chickens, uncountable quail, a large house, a disabled dog and a hugely complicated, successful, busy and lucrative career. Her husband, Joe Swash, is dreaming of a hereditary lake business and adopting an emu. Everything, in short, is much as it was as the third s

Key Takeaways

  • Stacey & Joe: In Too Deep review – Solomon deserves better than these dismal old misogynistic tropes.
  • The presenter is an absolute powerhouse – a responsible, clever, ambitious woman without whom nothing and no one around her would survive.
  • So why is she constantly described as bossy?

The presenter is an absolute powerhouse – a responsible, clever, ambitious woman without whom nothing and no one around her would survive. So why is she constantly described as bossy?Stacey Solomon is taking care of five children, 25 chickens, uncountable quail, a large house, a disabled dog and a hugely complicated, successful, busy and lucrative career. Her husband, Joe Swash, is dreaming of a hereditary lake business and adopting an emu.Everything, in short, is much as it was as the third series of the reality show, Stacey & Joe (this time subtitled In Too Deep), about the nation’s noisiest celebrity couple, begins. Everything is still very loud. Well, Joe is still very loud and thus everyone else still has to strain to be heard over him. Except the cockerel, to whom it comes quite naturally. Joe is afeard of the cockerel. That is because the cockerel clearly hates him. If there ever came a time that the nation was required to choose sides in their war, I would side firmly with the fowl. But we’ll come back to that. Continue reading...

Share:WhatsAppFacebookX (Twitter)Telegram

Read Complete Original Article

Published originally on The Guardian - UK

Visit Publisher Site →

Related News

🇬🇧 United Kingdom
Multikhabar App

All Information In One Place

Real-time headlines from trusted sources. Get the app now — stay updated, inspired, and ahead with breaking news!

Get it on Google Play