Readers respond to an article by Andy Burnham in which he says that people today can’t be held personally liable for the country’s historical wrongs In his opinion piece (30 October), Andy Burnham argues that British people today cannot be held liable for historical wrongs “in which they played no personal part”. On one level, he is right. But he confuses two very different things: personal liability and the continuing responsibility of the state.When slavery was abolished in the British empire in 1833, the government borrowed £20m – an extraordinary sum then – to compensate enslavers for the loss of their supposed property. Some 40,000 claims were made. The British taxpayer carried the cost, and the resulting public debt was not finally cleared until 2015. Continue reading...
Britain must have the courage to face its legacy of slavery | Letters
TH
The Guardian - UKBy Guardian Staff
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Readers respond to an article by Andy Burnham in which he says that people today can’t be held personally liable for the country’s historical wrongs In his opinion piece (30 October), Andy Burnham argues that British people today cannot be held liable for historical wrongs “in which they played no personal part”. On one level, he is right. But he confuses two very different things: personal liability and the continuing responsibility of the state. When slavery was abolished in the British empire
Key Takeaways
- Britain must have the courage to face its legacy of slavery | Letters.
- On one level, he is right.
- But he confuses two very different things: personal liability and the continuing responsibility of the state.
Read Complete Original Article
Published originally on The Guardian - UK
